Law firms
Contract review, redlines and risk scans across the document management system, privilege intact because nothing leaves the firm.
SolutionsLegal
Privilege survives the model.
Sending client material to a third-party model is not a procurement decision, it is a disclosure. Barie reads the firm’s documents where they already sit, under the permissions that already govern them, so the review gets done, nothing leaves, and nothing is waived.
Legal
Matter accessIn the firm
Signed in as A. Okafor · corporate
Matter 4471Meridian mergeropen
Matter 5120Zenith disputewalled
Matter 6033Orion IPopen
Answered from 2 of 3 matters. The wall held.
ethical walls the system already enforces0 B out
Across the practice
Built for the matters you cannot put in a chatbot.
In-house legal & compliance
Obligation tracking, policy review and regulatory change, run against the company’s own record rather than a vendor’s copy of it.
On the matters
The review that eats the associate’s week.
Nobody bills for reading four hundred contracts to find the twelve that matter. It is necessary work, largely unbillable, and exactly the shape a machine handles well, provided the machine is allowed to read the files at all.
- Contract review at volume. Whole portfolios audited against a clause standard, exceptions flagged to a partner with the passage attached.
- Diligence and disclosure. Data rooms triaged in full rather than sampled, every finding carried back to its source document.
- Precedent and knowledge. The firm’s own prior work made searchable, so a draft starts from what the firm already knows rather than from a blank document and somebody’s recollection.
Master services agreement clause audit
Result
Contracts reviewed against the firm’s clause standard, with every exception linked to the paragraph that triggered it.
Findings
- Uncapped liability in 3 agreements, escalated to partner
- Assignment clauses missing change-of-control consent
- Redline drafted back into the document system
Client material never left the firm’s tenancy0 B egress
A worked example, under privilege
Contracts reviewed without waiving privilege.
The material could not leave the firm, and no one was going to read it all. Here is what it looks like when the review ran against the document system in place.
Global Law Firm: Privileged Documents
Challenge
Thousands of privileged contracts and case files sat in silos. Public AI was off the table: sending client material to a third-party model risked waiving privilege and breaching confidentiality obligations.
Solution
Barie reads the firm’s document systems in place under existing permissions. Associates run contract review, redlines and risk scans as skills. Contracts are audited in a single run, high-risk clauses are flagged to partners, and privilege stays intact because nothing leaves the firm.
Why privilege holds
Confidentiality is architectural, not contractual.
A vendor’s promise not to train on your data is a term you would have to enforce, probably after the fact. Zero customer data egress is a property you can verify in advance. There is no path out to police.
Ethical walls hold
A matter you are conflicted out of stays invisible to you, and to anything you ask on your behalf. The barrier is the same one your document system already enforces.
A record for the court
Every document read and every action taken is recorded and replayable, for the client, the regulator, or the court, whichever asks first.
No third party to the matter
Inference runs on infrastructure the firm owns, inside the system that already holds the files, so no outside party ever becomes party to the work.
How permissions are carried through is detailed on the Platform page.
Own your intelligence.
Bring a clause standard and a folder of contracts. Nothing leaves the room.