Semiconductors & Deep Tech
Process documentation and design libraries queried where they live, with the fab boundary as the security boundary.
SolutionsDeep Tech
Decades of R&D, one upload from gone.
Process IP and design files are the whole company. Export control makes the question sharper still: it is not only who sees the file, but which jurisdiction it entered. With Barie the file never moves.
Deep Tech
Controlled technical dataOn‑prem
Analysis, on site
Assembly 7841 · ITAR
Tolerance conflict found
Material review complete
Export gateno transfer event
the export question is never reached0 B out
Across the engineering org
Built for the teams whose IP is the company.
Aerospace & Advanced Manufacturing
Controlled technical data analysed without a transfer. The compliance question never becomes an export question.
In the lab
The answer is in a file nobody can find.
Qualification evidence, tolerance history and failure analysis are all in the archive somewhere. Engineers rebuild the work instead, because searching thirty years of drawings reliably costs more than repeating the experiment, and the rebuilt work is rarely cheaper than the original.
- Design and tolerance review. Revisions compared across hundreds of CAD files, with conflicts surfaced alongside the drawing that proves them.
- Process IP retrieval. Recipes, run data and failure analyses searched inside the fab network and never copied out of it.
- Qualification evidence. Historic test reports located and matched against the specification currently under review, so the question is settled from the record rather than from memory.
Tolerance conflict review: assembly 7841
Findings
Revision C compared against the qualified baseline and the 2019 test archive.
Flagged
- 3 tolerance conflicts between rev B and rev C
- 1 fastener spec contradicts the qualification report
- Prior test evidence located in a 2019 archive
318 files read in place · none copied0 B egress
A worked example, under export control
Process IP searched without a single transfer.
Engineers were rebuilding qualification work rather than risk an upload. Here is what it looks like when the designs could be analysed where they already sat.
Semiconductor Firm: Export-Controlled IP
Challenge
Decades of process IP and chip designs are the whole company. Export control sharpens the question: not just who sees a file, but which jurisdiction it entered. A single upload to a public model was an unacceptable risk.
Solution
With Barie the file never moves. Engineers analyse designs and process documents on the firm’s own infrastructure, under export-compliant controls, with an immutable record of every access, so the IP stays put and the work still gets done.
Why it survives export review
Export control is a location problem, not a policy one.
Controlled technical data is governed by where it goes, not by who promises to look after it. Barie removes the transfer entirely, which means the export question never has to be asked, and no engineer has to decide whether an upload is defensible.
Nothing crosses a border
Analysis happens on the machine the file already sits on. No controlled data is transferred anywhere in order to be processed.
Runs beside the line
Deploys onto plant-floor and fab infrastructure, not only the corporate data centre, so the analysis happens on the side of the boundary the data is already on.
Provable handling
An immutable record of every controlled file touched, by whom and on which machine, and evidence that none of it left the facility.
Where inference physically runs is covered on the Platform page.
Own your intelligence.
See Barie running inside your own facility, on your own designs, without a file leaving the building.